Big Four consultants face ban from tax regulator board

Disclosure:Ā Lifestyle Wealth Partners Pty Ltd and its advisers are authorised representatives of Fortnum Private Wealth Ltd ABN 54 139 889 535 AFSL 357306.Ā General Advice Warning:Ā Any information on this website is general advice and does not take into account any person's objectives, financial situation or needs. Please consider your own circumstances and consider whether the advice is right for you before making a decision. Always obtain a Product Disclosure Statement (If applicable) to understand the full implications and risks relating to the product and consider the Statement before making any decision about whether to acquire the financial product.

Partners from the Big Four consulting firms could be banned from serving on the board of the tax advisory regulator, in the first legislative move against the companies since the PwC tax scandal.

After securing government agreement, the Greens will introduce an amendment to the Treasury Laws Amendment Bill to the Senate on Wednesday.

Their proposal would ban any any senior executive or partners working at tax companies with 100 or more employees or ongoing links to large firms ā€“ such as Big Four members Deloitte, EY, KPMG and PwC ā€“ from becoming a member of the Tax Practitioners Board, mitigating conflicts of interests.

Greens senator Barbara Pocock said the original bill didnā€™t pass ā€œthe pub testā€.

ā€œThe Australian public wonā€™t tolerate special privileges for highly paid tax accountants and their clients while they are required to observe the letter of the law,ā€ she said.

ā€œWeā€™re kicking the foxes out of the hen house.ā€

The board regulates the tax advisory industry and maintains powers to deregister advisors who engage in serious misconduct.

But when PwC tax partner Peter-John Collins was revealed to have passed on confidential Treasury information to boost private sector business for the firm, 43 per cent of Tax Practitioners Board members were former partners from one of the Big Four companies.

Two of them were ex-PwC partners who were still receiving payments from the firm.

Though they recused themselves from the investigation, the composition of the board could still be perceived as a conflict of interest, because senior consultants were essentially being asked to regulate themselves.

But the Greensā€™ amendment could make the practice a relic of the past.

ā€œNever again will we have members of the Tax Practitioner Board financially tied to those same large tax agents they are regulating,ā€ Senator Pocock said.

Under the proposal, tax agents who have breached the code of professional conduct may have to report others who have done the same and proactively inform their own clients.

This prevents partners from protecting each other and turning a blind eye to unethical behaviour, Senator Pocock says.

The Tax Practitioners Code of Professional Conduct will also be updated so any adherents must maintain confidentiality, agree not to use government information for personal advantage, identify, avoid and declare conflicts of interest, uphold the code, not provide false or misleading statements and maintain client transparency.

ā€œIf weā€™ve learned anything from the PwC tax scandal itā€™s that we need to pay much closer attention to the regulation of the professional services sector in general and tax advisors in particular,ā€ Senator Pocock said.

Ā 

Kat Wong
(Australian Associated Press)

0

Like This